Guidelines and Policies for Abstract Submission
Call for Proposals is will open August 1, 2019 and close at 11:59pm EDT on September 23, 2019. We anticipate a large number of submissions for this year’s conference and as a result we will not be accepting late submissions or extending the submission deadline.
Please read the guidelines and policies below carefully before submitting your proposal as there are some guidelines that have changed this year to comply with updated CE/CME guidelines. Failure to comply with guidelines could result in your presentation being declined.
General Guidelines and Policies
- All presenters, including invited, plenary and pre-conference workshop speakers must submit proposals online and will be required to register for the conference.
- Each individual is limited to no more than three (3) submissions. These submissions include any presentation where you are in the role of presenter, co-presenter, chair, or discussant. Poster sessions are not included.
- We also suggest that one individual gather all the required information from all individuals (presenters, co-presenters, authors, etc.) ahead of time and be responsible for making the submission.
- We strongly suggest that you prepare a word processing file that contains all of your submission information from each individual involved in your submission in advance (i.e. presenters, co-presenters, authors, etc.). This will save time online and ensure that you have a backup copy of all of your information. The following information is needed:
- Title and abstract of your proposal.
- If you are submitting a symposium, you will need:
- the title and abstract of the symposium, AND
- the titles, abstracts, and authors of each paper that will be presented in the symposium
- The names, degrees, designation, unique email address, complete mailing address, and phone number of all individuals involved in your submission. A CV (Word or PDF) and financial disclosure is also required.
- Three learning objectives that use acceptable verbs to complete the sentence, “Participants will be able to…” We recommend that you download and use the list of acceptable verbs.
- Five citations from peer-reviewed sources from the last 10 years in American Psychological Association style. Half of all references must be from the last five years. Go to the American Psychological Association style Quick Answers-References Web pages.
- The submission site will not allow you to submit your proposal until you have provided all items.
- Abstracts must be relevant to and mention trauma and/or dissociation. Therapists may not present with their own clients at this conference. We do not accept first-person accounts of trauma. We request that details of clients’ traumatic experiences not be discussed during presentations, since explicit details of trauma may be distressing to the audience and do not enhance learning.
- The most common reasons a proposal is rejected are for an incomplete, poorly written, or unclear abstract, and other failures to follow submission guidelines. Your submitted abstract must be complete, clear, concise, and grammatically correct in order to be considered by the program committee. For suggestions on how to improve your conference proposal, view our guide, Tips for Writing a Great Conference Proposal.
- Those for whom English is a second language or have expressive language difficulties may request help from someone on the program committee in editing their abstracts to meet acceptable grammatical standards. Such requests should be made BEFORE the proposal is submitted. You may contact Mary Pat Hanlin at email@example.com to receive support.
- Presentations should be original contributions (i.e., they have not been published prior to the date that you submitted the abstract).
- Abstracts will be published in their original form in the conference app and online schedule.
- Case material and biographical information must be disguised so that the client’s identity is concealed.
- If you have difficulties with the online submission process please contact the ISSTD office at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- You will be notified by e-mail about your proposal’s status in November 2019. All decisions of the program committee are final.
|Type||Details||Word Count||# of Presenters||Discussant Required?|
|Single Paper or Case Study|
Paper Sessions are 90 minutes in length and contain four (4) 20-minute papers
|Research, theoretical, clinical, or case study. Authors of unaccepted submissions may be offered the opportunity to present their paper as a Poster (see Posters below).||300 words||1 or more presenters||Discussant n/a|
Session Length: 90 minutes
|Several presentations on a specific theme, issue, or question.||Overview: 50 words Each presenter’s abstract: 300 words||2–5 presenters, including discussant||Discussant Optional|
Session Length: 90 Minutes
|Expert panelists conduct an organized discussion of a specific theme, issue, or question. Note: Audience interaction is limited with the panelists discussing answers to audience questions.||Overview: 300 words||2–5 presenters, including discussant||Discussant Optional|
Session Length: 90 Minutes
|A 30-45 minute presentation followed by 45-60 minutes of discussion with the audience. Note: Audience interaction and discussion is encouraged.||300 words||1-3 presenters, not including the moderator||Discussant Optional|
90 Minutes or 180 Minutes
|Workshops help participants to increase their understanding and skill in a particular area of interest, or use case material to illustrate clinical, theoretical, or policy issues. Workshops should include both didactic and practical or experiential components.||300 words||1-5 presenters||Discussant n/a|
|Poster||Paper presentation in poster form. Download & Save Details for Poster Submissions.||300 words||1-4 presenters||Discussant n/a|
|Film, videotape, music, artwork,|
or other forms of media
|300 words||1-2 presenters, including discussant||Discussant Optional|
Presentations must designate the knowledge/skill level required of the participant (i.e., Introductory, Intermediate, or Advanced). Although these are only general guides, they are required in order to comply with continuing education regulations.
- Introductory: Suitable for all professional participants (including students). Such presentations include basic knowledge, techniques, or skills.
- Intermediate: Requires participants to have at least some work experience in order to gain maximum benefit from the presentation.
- Advanced: Participants require a high level of training and substantial experience in the topic. Such presentations are geared to specialists and to those in advanced stages of their career.
Abstracts for presentations should include the purpose, methods, findings, and conclusions. Submission of findings is strongly encouraged. Other types of abstracts should include purpose, population, main points to be covered, and conclusions.
Each submission must include 3 learning objectives. You may ONLY use verbs that are in the list provided for you: click here to download and save a list of acceptable verbs. Each Learning Objective must be a complete sentence that begins with the words, “Participants will be able to…”
ISSTD Certificate Program Questions
Each submission, except for posters, must include 3 multiple choice questions and answers. These questions must have four answer options and cannot include “all of the above” or “none of the above” as an option.
Statement of Ethical Standards
All work presented at the ISSTD Annual Conference must conform to discipline-appropriate national or professional ethical standards. ISSTD strongly opposes the exploitation of patients for any purpose. Submissions wherein clinicians, researchers, or academics collaborate and/or co-present with their own patients are considered dual relationships and are wholly unacceptable. All case material, including biographical information, must be disguised so that the patient’s identity is concealed.
Potential to Distress
All submissions must declare whether the presentation has potential to cause audience distress. The conference abstract submission site will ask about this. The submission site will ask you about this issue; you do not need to place a statement about potential for distress in your abstract.
Updated for 2020! Accreditation for continuing education specifies that each proposal must be accompanied by five complete citations of peer reviewed sources less than 10 years old (in American Psychological Association style). At least two citations must be from the last five years. For detailed information on APA Style, click here.
Criteria for Review
All submissions are rated for importance, rigor (scientific, clinical or intellectual), scope of coverage of the topic, relevance to trauma and dissociation, and consistency with the meeting theme. Training presentations (Workshops and Pre-Conference Workshops) are additionally rated for presenter qualifications and usefulness of the training objectives (to the clinical or research work of ISSTD members). Proposals must be sufficiently detailed to allow evaluation of these criteria.
Information About the Online Submission Site
ISSTD uses the CadmiumCD Abstract Management System for online submission of proposals for the 2020 Annual Conference. The button at the bottom of this page takes you to the Submission Site where you will log in and submit your proposal. Please follow each step carefully.
International Society for the Study of Trauma and Dissociation